2010 World Cup

Search

Woah, woah, Daddy's wrong, Mommy's right.
Joined
Feb 25, 2006
Messages
7,977
Tokens
Doubt over South Africa 2010

Luke Harding in Berlin
Wednesday July 12, 2006
The Guardian

Fifa executives have voiced "serious" doubts about whether South Africa will be able to host the next World Cup in 2010 and have discussed a radical contingency plan that would see the United States stage the tournament instead, it was reported in Germany yesterday.

According to the German sports news agency SID, Fifa officials have privately raised worries over South Africa's continuing failure to prepare for the tournament and have also discussed the possibility of staging the tournament again in Germany.

Article continues
Fifa's 24-member executive committee gathered in Berlin over the weekend to watch the World Cup final and, according to the agency, delegates meeting in the luxurious Hotel Adlon just opposite the Brandenburg Gate spent much of the weekend deep in conversation over what to do if South Africa fell further behind with its World Cup preparations. There are long-standing doubts about whether stadiums can be built and modernised in time but there are even more serious concerns about South Africa's transport infrastructure and whether it will be able to cope with the tens of thousands of fans travelling between venues.

Yesterday Fifa insisted that the tournament would go ahead in South Africa as planned. "The World Cup in Germany was wonderful. But the next one will take place in South Africa," its spokesman Markus Siegler insisted.

Fifa officials have indicated that no final decision is likely to be taken until after the president Sepp Blatter stands for re-election next May. Blatter, a big supporter of South Africa's ultimately successful bid, needs the votes from African delegates to ensure his re-election in the ballot next year in Zurich.

Lennart Johansson has announced that he will stand for re-election as president of Uefa when his term expires next year. Johansson, who has been in the role since 1990, was expected to stand down but at a meeting of the European ruling body's executive board yesterday he announced his intention to stand for another four-year term.

The Czech Republic's midfielder Karel Poborsky has announced his retirement from international soccer at the age of 34, as planned before the World Cup. He played a record 118 times and scored eight goals for his country.
 

New member
Joined
Jan 16, 2006
Messages
61
Tokens
Logical. I'm not sure too many countries could host the tournament on short notice. Spain, Germany, England, Italy and France are the only other countries I can think of that could pull this off.

The '94 World Cup was a huge success and there has been steady construction of new American football stadiums that would serve as great venues for soccer matches.

I'm all for FIFA spreading around the host nation to each federation, but if things don't work out for South Africa I'd love to see it come back here.

Just for kicks here are the sites I would choose:
1. Rose Bowl, 92,000.
2. Stanford Stadium, 85,000.
3. Cardinals Stadium, 63,000. This is the new Arizona Cardinals stadium that will have a retractable roof, thus making it feasible to have afternoon matches there in the desert, which will enable European audiences to watch the game in the evening.
4. Reliant Stadium, Houston, 71,000. Much like Cardinals Stadium, Reliant has a retractable roof.
5. Invesco Field, Denver, 76,000.
6. Arrowhead Stadium, Kansas City, 79,000.
7. Soldier Field, Chicago, 61,000.
8. Dolphin Stadium, 75,000.
9. FedEx Field, Washington D.C., 91,000.
10. Giants Stadium, 80,000.
11. Gilette Stadium, greater Boston area, 68,000.

I would also consider giving one game to Columbus, who have a beautiful soccer specific stadium, but it only seats 22,000. Not sure if that meets FIFA specifications.
 

Woah, woah, Daddy's wrong, Mommy's right.
Joined
Feb 25, 2006
Messages
7,977
Tokens
I imagine those are the stadiums they would choose, although it may be too hot in Phoenix. Probably also choose the Seahawks new stadium and Ford Field in Detroit (they used the Silverdome last time) and maybe the stadium in Atlanta (its name escapes me right now). Stanford stadium is being remodeled for this season and will be smaller (like 60 or 65), but much better than the old version.

I imagine all the soccer specific stadiums in the US are too small, with the possible exception of Home Depot in LA.

They wouldn't go right back to Germany and England is 2014, which means the other 3 are the only likely options. I suppose Portugal could do it as well since they just had the Euro. They had to do the same thing back in 1986 when Mexico had to take over for Columbia.
 

Oh boy!
Joined
Mar 21, 2004
Messages
38,373
Tokens
fhmesq44 said:
I imagine those are the stadiums they would choose, although it may be too hot in Phoenix. Probably also choose the Seahawks new stadium and Ford Field in Detroit (they used the Silverdome last time) and maybe the stadium in Atlanta (its name escapes me right now). Stanford stadium is being remodeled for this season and will be smaller (like 60 or 65), but much better than the old version.

I imagine all the soccer specific stadiums in the US are too small, with the possible exception of Home Depot in LA.

They wouldn't go right back to Germany and England is 2014, which means the other 3 are the only likely options. I suppose Portugal could do it as well since they just had the Euro. They had to do the same thing back in 1986 when Mexico had to take over for Columbia.

I was thinking of the Home Depot Center as well however they have a soccer capacity of 27,000. The Rose Bowl would be a better venue due to the capacity concerns alone.
 

CURATOR / MEMBER EMERITUS
Joined
Dec 21, 1999
Messages
3,061
Tokens
I'm REAL concerned with SECURITY, everything else can be as substandard as they wish to leave it-- if the players have to work harder, so be it.
 

Winning isn't everything ... it's the ONLY THING !
Joined
Dec 18, 2004
Messages
2,816
Tokens
Here are some Early Odds for World Cup 2010

Brazil
3dflagsdotcom_brazi_2fawm.gif
4-1


Argentina
3dflagsdotcom_argen_2fawm.gif
11-2


Italia
3dflagsdotcom_italy_2fawm.gif
8-1


England
3dflagsdotcom_ukeng_2fawm.gif
8-1
 

acw

Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
1,313
Tokens
Logical. I'm not sure too many countries could host the tournament on short notice. Spain, Germany, England, Italy and France are the only other countries I can think of that could pull this off.
I do agree that the USA sould be added to this list and Japan/Korea too, if it were just because they held it not too long ago.
 

New member
Joined
Jan 16, 2006
Messages
61
Tokens
I always wondered why Mexico hosted two tournaments 16 years apart.

Portugal slipped my mind but I should have included them considering they did just host a major international tournament two years ago.
 

New member
Joined
May 31, 2006
Messages
9,387
Tokens
Cool...if US hosts, they get an automatic 1-seed, right?

Or is it just guaranteed they'll be in the tournament?
 

Woah, woah, Daddy's wrong, Mommy's right.
Joined
Feb 25, 2006
Messages
7,977
Tokens
auto bid, not auto 1 seed. Playing in CONCACAF is equivalent to auto bid for US and Mex anyway.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,118,842
Messages
13,560,250
Members
100,691
Latest member
ybb
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com